What is the C2 pedicle, pars interarticularis, and isthmus? Anatomical study and review of the literature regarding these confusing terms with proposal of new nomenclature.

INTRODUCTION: The atypical anatomy of the C2 vertebra has led to terminological discrepancies within reports and studies in the literature regarding the location of its pedicle, pars interarticularis, and isthmus. These discrepancies not only limit the power of morphometric analyses, but they also confuse technical reports regarding operations involving C2, and thus confuse our ability to properly communicate this anatomy. Herein, we examine the variations in nomenclature regarding the pedicle, pars interarticularis, and isthmus of C2, and via an anatomical study, propose new terminology. METHODS: The articular surface and underlying superior and inferior articular processes and adjacent transverse processes were removed from 15 C2 vertebrae (30 sides). Specifically, the areas regarded as the pedicle, pars interarticularis, and isthmus were evaluated. Morphometrics were performed. RESULTS: Our results indicate that, anatomically, C2 has no "isthmus" and that a pars interarticularis for C2, when present, is very short. Deconstruction of the attached parts allowed for visualization of a bony arch extending from the anterior most aspect of the lamina to the body of C2. The arch is composed almost entirely of trabecular bone and without its attached parts, e.g., transverse process, really has no cortical bone laterally. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a more accurate terminology, the pedicle, for pars/pedicle screw placement of C2. Such a term more accurately describes this unique structure of the C2 vertebra and would alleviate terminological confusion in the future literature on this topic.

Two-Surgeon Multidisciplinary Approach to Pediatric Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Single-Institution Series and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: A collaborative 2-surgeon approach is becoming increasingly popular in surgery but is not widely used for pediatric cervical spine fusions. The goal of this study is to present a large single-institution experience with pediatric cervical spinal fusion using a multidisciplinary 2-surgeon team, including a neurosurgeon and an orthopedic surgeon. This team-based approach has not been previously reported in the pediatric cervical spine literature. METHODS: A single-institution review of pediatric cervical spine instrumentation and fusion performed by a surgical team composed of neurosurgery and orthopedics during 2002-2020 was performed. Demographics, presenting symptoms and indications, surgical characteristics, and outcomes were recorded. Particular focus was given to describe the primary surgical responsibility of the orthopedic surgeon and the neurosurgeon. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients (54% male) with an average age of 12.1 (range 2-26) years met the inclusion criteria. The most common indications for surgery were os odontoideum with instability (n=21) and trauma (n=18). Syndromes were present in 44 (39%) cases. Fifty-five (49%) patients presented with preoperative neurological deficits (26 motor, 12 sensory, and 17 combined deficits). At the time of the last clinical follow-up, 44 (80%) of these patients had stabilization or resolution of their neurological deficit. There was 1 new postoperative neural deficit (1%). The average time between surgery and successful radiologic arthrodesis was 13.2±10.6 mo. A total of 15 (13%) patients experienced complications within 90 days of surgery (2 intraoperative, 6 during admission, and 7 after discharge). CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary 2-surgeon approach to pediatric cervical spine instrumentation and fusion provides a safe treatment option for complex pediatric cervical cases. It is hoped that this study could provide a model for other pediatric spine groups interested in implementing a multi-specialty 2-surgeon team to perform complex pediatric cervical spine fusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

Analysis of surgical strategies and efficacy in the treatment of Os odontoideum with atlantoaxial dislocation.

BACKGROUND: There are many classification systems for atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). Among these systems, the definitions of irreducible AAD remain vague, and its treatments are not unified. OBJECTIVE: To explore the surgical strategies and efficacy for the treatment of os odontoideum (OO) with AAD. METHODS: The clinical data of 56 OO patients with AAD who underwent surgery from January 2017 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. AAD was classified into four types, Type I and type II were treated with posterior fixation and fusion. Type III received posterior fixation and fusion after irreducible dislocations were converted to reducible dislocations by translateral mass release or transoral release. Type IV required transoral release for conversion into reducible dislocations before posterior fixation and fusion. The operation time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. The preoperative and postoperative neurological function changes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. Postoperative fusion status was assessed by X-ray. RESULTS: There were 40 cases of type I-II, 14 cases of type III, and two cases of type IV AAD. The operation times of single posterior fixation and fusion, combined translateral mass release and combined transoral release were 130.52 ± 37.12 min, 151.11 ± 16.91 min and 188.57 ± 44.13 min, the blood loss were 162.63 ± 58.27 mL, 235.56 ± 59.94 mL, 414.29 ± 33.91 mL, respectively. One patient with type III died, one with type III underwent revision surgery due to infection, and three patients with type I had further neurological deterioration after operation. fifty-five patients were followed up for 12-24 months. The follow-up results showed that enough decompression was achieved and that fixation and fusion were effective. The JOA score increased from 9.58 ± 1.84 points preoperative to 13.09 ± 2.68 points at 3 months after operation, 14.07 ± 2.83 points at 6 months and 14.25 ± 2.34 at 12 months after operation, all significant differences compared with preoperative results (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: OO patients with irreducible AAD can be treated by translateral mass release or transoral release combined with posterior fixation and fusion, while some of those with bony fusion can be treated by transoral release combined with posterior fixation and fusion.

Surgical Management Of Irreducible Atlanto-Axial Dislocation With OS Odontoideum And Klippel-Feil Syndrome.

Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) is the congenital fusion of two or more cervical vertebrae which is often associated with various other abnormalities in the cervical spine. Involvement the upper cervical segments leads to atlanto-axial instability which manifests as progressive neurological symptoms due to compression on the spinal cord. These cases pose a surgical challenge due the abnormal and unique anatomy of each patient. A 37-year-old patient presented with neck pain and cervical myelopathy due to a posterior subluxation of C2-3 fused segment over C4-6 fused segment. The patient had an os odontoideum, incomplete posterior arch of C1, anomalous course of vertebral artery and C3 hemi-vertebra. The patient was successfully managed with transoral odontoidectomy and occipeto-cervical fusion. Irreducible atlanto-axial dislocation in a patient with an abnormal upper cervical spine anatomy may require transoral decompression followed by posterior fusion.

Traumatic spondylolisthesis of axis: clinical and imaging experience at a level one trauma center.

PURPOSE: Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis (TSA) with bilateral pars interarticularis fracture (a pattern also known as Hangman's fractures) accounts for 4-5% of all cervical fractures. Various classification systems have been described to assist therapeutic decision-making. The goal is to reassess the utility of these classifications for treatment strategy and evaluate additional imaging associations. METHODS: This is an IRB approved, retrospective analysis of patients with imaging diagnosis of TSA from 2016 to 2019. Consensus reads were performed classifying TSA into various Levine and Edwards subtypes and typical vs. atypical fractures. Other imaging findings such as additional cervical fractures, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and vertebral artery injury were recorded. Treatment strategy and outcome were reviewed from clinical charts. Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included, with a mean age of 62.7 ± 25 years, and male to female ratio of 1:1.2. Motor vehicle collision was the most common cause of TSA. Type I and III injuries were the most and the least common injuries, respectively. Patients with type I injuries were found to have good healing rates with conservative management (p < 0.001) while type IIa and III injuries were managed with surgical stabilization (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively). No statistical difference was observed in the treatment strategy for type II fractures (p = 0.12) and its prediction of the associated injuries. Atypical fractures were not found to have a higher incidence of SCI (p = 0.31). A further analysis revealed significantly higher-grade vertebral artery injuries (grades III and IV according to Biffl grading) in patients with type IIa and III injuries (p = 0.001) and an 11-fold increased risk of TBI compared to type I and type II fractures (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: TSA fracture types were not associated with any clinical outcome. Levine and Edwards type II classification itself is not enough to guide the treatment plan and does not account for associated injuries. Additional imaging markers may be needed.

Asymmetry of the C2 pars interarticularis: a clinical anatomical study with relevance to screw placement.

PURPOSE: Potential asymmetries of the C2 posterior elements pose a problem for the spine surgeon seeking to make the best choice for spinal stabilization while reducing morbidity. METHODS: A digital caliper was used to measure the pars interarticularis height and length on left and right sides of 25 adult C2 vertebrae. The pars interarticularis was defined as the bone between the posterior most aspect of the superior articular process and the anterior most aspect of the inferior articular process of C2. Also, the C2 vertebrae from 49 patients were scanned by CT. Parasagittal images were reviewed and using the same definitions as were used for the skeletal specimens, the length and the height of the C2 pars interarticularis from both the left and right sides were measured using CT. The image slices were acquired at 3 mm intervals. The pars interarticularis height was determined on sagittal CT reconstruction, while the pars interarticularis length was calculated on the basis of the axial images. RESULTS: The lengths and the heights of the left and right pars interarticularis were compared using CTs of patients and skeletal specimens. No significant differences were found in the length and height measurements of the CT images on both sides. However, in the skeletal specimens, the left and right pars interarticularis did not differ significantly in length but differed significantly in height (p = 0.003). The mean height of the left pars interarticularis was approximately two times larger than the right in the skeletal specimens. Absolute differences were calculated between the side with the greater length and height and the side with the lesser length and height irrespective of their left-right orientations. For CT measurements, most differences in length and height between the greater pars interarticularis and lesser pars interarticularis occurred between 0 and 1 mm with each successive disparity interval yielding lower numbers. Skeletal measurements revealed a similar length disparity distribution to the CT measurements. However, height measurements in the skeletal specimens varied widely. Eight pars interarticularis specimens demonstrated a height difference between 0 and 1 mm. No dry bone pars interarticularis specimens demonstrated a height difference between 1 and 2 mm. The pars interarticularis of nine specimens demonstrated a height difference between 2 and 3 mm. Two demonstrated a height difference between 3 and 4 mm. Four demonstrated a height difference between 4 and 5 mm and two demonstrated a height difference greater than 5 mm. The greater pars interarticularis lengths and heights were combined and compared to their lesser counterparts on CT and skeletal measurements. In all measurements of this type, significant differences were found in the pars interarticularis length and height, whether measured through CT or via digital calipers. CONCLUSION: Asymmetry between the left and right C2 pars interarticularis as shown in the present study can alter surgical planning. Therefore, knowledge of this anatomical finding might be useful to spine surgeons.

C2 Nerve Root Preservation During Posterior Fixation for Instability Secondary to Congenital Craniovertebral Junction Anomalies: Feasibility Factors and Related Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with instability because of congenital craniovertebral anomalies often have complex C1-C2 osseovascular anomalies. C2 nerve root sacrifice has been described to address such difficult anatomy during posterior C1-C2 fixation and has its own downsides. Its preservation as a recent alternative poses greater surgical challenge, and the considerations differ from other causes of craniovertebral junctional instability; the pertaining outcomes have been scarcely studied. The objective of this study was to prospectively determine the feasibility and outcomes related to C2 nerve root preservation in patients with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation (CAAD) after posterior C1-C2 fixation. METHODS: In this observational study, 63 patients (126 nerve roots) with CAAD after posterior fixation were prospectively assessed. Underlying osseovascular anomalies affecting the feasibility of C2 nerve root preservation, and C2 nerve-related dysfunction at 12 months follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall C2 nerve root preservation rate was 89.7%. Even in the presence of extreme joint obliquity/spondyloptosis and anomalous vertebral artery, it was feasible in about three fourths. After preservation, 28.3% patients developed new-onset C2 nerve root dysfunction: neuralgia in 2, dysesthesia in 6, and hypoesthesia/paresthesia in 9. The symptoms were not disabling in most patients. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients with CAAD, C2 nerve root preservation is feasible despite an aberrant bony and vascular anatomy. A few patients after nerve root preservation develop related symptoms that are conservatively manageable, with no significant adverse consequences. Given the controversy in the literature on C2 nerve sacrifice-related outcomes, we favor an attempt at C2 nerve root preservation.

Surgical Outcomes for C2 Tear Drop Fractures: Clinical Relevance to Hangman's Fracture and C2-3 Discoligamentous Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze characteristics of surgically managed tear drop (TD) fractures of the C2 axis associated with other injuries such as hangman's fracture and C2-3 discoligamentous injury as well as treatment outcomes. METHODS: A total of 14 patients (eight men and six women) with TD fractures of the C2 , who were surgically treated at four national trauma centers of tertiary university hospitals from January 2000 to December 2017, were included in this retrospective study. The mean age of the patients was 45.5 years (ranging from 19 to 74 years). The characteristics, surgical treatment methods (anterior fusion vs posterior fusion), and results of 14 TD fractures of the C2 were analyzed retrospectively. And the clinical relevance between C2 TD fracture and hangman's fracture and C2-3 discoligamentous injury was investigated through the co-occurrence between injuries. The mean follow-up time after surgery was 22.6 months (ranging from 12 to 60 months). RESULTS: Among 14 patients with TD fracture of the C2 , four patients (28.6%) had anterior TD fracture and 10 patients (71.4%) had posterior TD fracture. All 10 posterior TD fracture patients had anterior C2-3 displacement. While two of four anterior TD fracture patients had posterior C2-3 displacement, the remaining two did not. All 14 patients of TD fracture had at least two or more other associated C2 injuries as well as C2-3 discoligamentous injuries. About 92.9% (13/14) of the patients had typical or atypical hangman's fracture; 100% (10/10) of the posterior TD fracture patients had hangman's fracture, but 75% (3/4) of the anterior TD fracture had hangman's fracture. At admission, 13 patients were neurologically intact. However, the remaining patient had spinal cord injury with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale B with C2-3 bilateral facet dislocation. All four anterior TD fracture patients underwent posterior C2-3 fusion. While four of 10 posterior TD fracture patients underwent C2-3 anterior fusion, the remaining six underwent posterior fusion. At last follow-up, 100% (14/14) of the patients achieved solid fusion, and visual analog scale for neck pain was significantly improved (5.9 vs 2.2, P < 0.001). One patient with ASIA impairment scale B had significantly improved to scale D. No major complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that surgically managed TD fractures of the C2 showed a high incidence of other associated spine injuries including hangman's fracture and C2-3 discoligamentous injury. Therefore, special attention and careful radiologic evaluation are needed to investigate the presence of other associated spine injuries including hangman's fracture and C2-3 discoligamentous injury, which are likely to require surgery.

Tumor vertebral primario de axis: un desafío clínico y quirúrgico / Primary vertebral tumor of axis: A clinical and surgical challenge

Presentamos el caso de un varón de 17 años que acude a urgencias por cervicalgia de 6 semanas de evolución, sin déficit neurológico. La tomografía y resonancia magnética mostraban una masa dependiente de C2 con infiltración de partes blandas e invasión del canal medular, sin signos de mielopatía. Se realizó biopsia guiada con tomografía. Esperando al resultado, el paciente desarrolló una tetraparesia aguda con incompetencia de esfínteres. Una nueva resonancia magnética mostró un aumento de la masa ósea tumoral con extensión epidural, mielopatía y nuevas lesiones vertebrales. Se realizó una resección posterior y descompresión medular de urgencia, con fijación occipito-cervical. La recuperación postoperatoria fue completa. La inmunohistoquímica reveló un sarcoma de Ewing. Se inició quimioterapia con respuesta parcial. El sarcoma de Ewing primario atlantoaxial es una entidad excepcional con mal pronóstico. Su tratamiento es multidisciplinar, incluyendo una resección total si es posible, lo cual supone un reto para el cirujano (AU)

We report the case of a 17-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a six weeks history of neck pain and no neurogical deficit. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed an expansile lesion in the axis, with soft tissue and spinal cavity invasion, without mielopathy signs. Tomography-guided mass biopsy was taken. Waiting for histopathologic results, the pacient developed acute tetraparesis and sphincter incompetence. Magnetic resonance revealed that the bone mass had grown with epidural compromise, mielopathy and new vertebral lesions. Medular decompression with laminectomy, excision of the posterior elements of axis with the involved soft tissue mass and occipito-cervical fixation was performed. Neurological recovery was complete. Inmunochemistry revealed an Ewing Sarcoma. Chemoteraphy treatment was given, with partial response. Primary Ewing sarcoma of atlas-axis is a rare entity with poor prognosis. Multidisciplinary approach treatment is needed, with a total surgical resection if it is possible, a real challenge for the surgeon (AU)

Upper Cervical Trauma.

Craniocervical injuries (CCJs) account for 10% to 30% of all cervical spine trauma. An increasing number of patients are surviving these injuries due to advancements in automobile technology, resuscitation techniques, and diagnostic modalities. The leading injury mechanisms are motor vehicle crashes, falls from height, and sports-related events. Current treatment with urgent rigid posterior fixation of the occiput to the cervical spine has resulted in a substantial reduction in management delays expedites treatment of CCJ injuries. Within CCJ injuries, there is a spectrum of instability, ranging from isolated nondisplaced occipital condyle fractures treated nonoperatively to highly unstable injuries with severely distracted craniocervical dissociation. Despite the evolution of understanding and improvement in the management of cases regarding catastrophic failure to diagnose, subsequent neurologic deterioration still occurs even in experienced trauma centers. The purpose of this article is to review the injuries that occur at the CCJ with the accompanying anatomy, presentation, imaging, classification, management, and outcomes.

Evolution to Pedicle Reformation Technique in Surgical Management of Hangman's Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Opinions vary regarding optimal treatment of unstable hangman's fractures. Recent technological advances have allowed short segment, motion preserving fixation, even in complex cases. The aim of the study was to demonstrate C1-C2 motion-preserving short-segment fusion in hangman's fracture and the evolution of technique from pedicle realignment to pedicle reformation in complex fractures with resorbed/destroyed C2 pedicles. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Patients operated by a single surgeon at a tertiary level center from 2012 to 2018 were included. The type of fracture, operating time, and blood loss was recorded. Neurologic deficits were recorded using the American Spinal Injury Association scale with regular clinicoradiologic follow-up. RESULTS: Nine patients (8 male), with a mean age of 36 ± 16.9 years were included. In the initial 7 patients, C2 pedicle screw, C3-C4 lateral mass screw, and rod fixation was done. The last 2 patients were complex neglected injuries, with 1 having severe angulation and displacement and the other having spondyloptosis with C2 body placed anterior to C4 body. In both these patients, direct C2 body screw were placed and pedicle reconstruction was done. Mean follow up was 41.4 ± 29.8 months. All 5 patients with preoperative neurologic deficits had improvement in power. C1-C2 joint motion was preserved in all. All patients had bony fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of motion at the C1-C2 joint should be the goal in all surgically managed hangman's fracture patients. The technique of C2 pedicle reconstruction can be utilized for the same in old neglected hangman's fractures.

Is the Measurement of Pedicle Axial Axes on Computed Tomography in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Also a Guide for Safer Screwing?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of pedicle angle measurement in preoperative axial computed tomography in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) on correct thoracic screw placement in free-hand technique on 3-dimensional printing AIS models. METHODS: In this study, 14 3-dimensional spine models with a scale of 1:1, including the entire spine of a patient with Lenke type 1 curve, were used. Group 1 included screwing applications with unknown pedicle axial angles, and group 2 included screwing applications with known pedicle axial angles. The number and direction of screws in malposition were recorded. In addition, medial encroachment distances of the screws were classified as 0-4 mm and greater than 4 mm, and lateral encroachment distances were classified as 0-6 mm and greater than 6 mm. Evaluation parameters were compared statistically between the groups. RESULTS: The number of screws in the correct position in group 1 was lower than that in group 2 (P < 0.05). The medial and lateral malposition rate in group 1 was greater than that in group 2 (P < 0.05). The medial encroachment rate of 4 mm and greater and lateral encroachment rate of 6 mm and greater in group 1 was greater than that in group 2 (P < 0.05). The medial encroachment rate of 0-4 mm and lateral encroachment rate of 0-6 mm were similar between groups 1 and 2 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of pedicle axial axes of preoperative thoracic vertebrae on computed tomography in patients with AIS offers more reliable screwing in free-hand technique.

4-Point C2 Fixation for Occipitocervical Fusion: Technical Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Occipitocervical fusion is an important surgical procedure to treat instability of the upper cervical and craniocervical junction. Fixation to the dense cortical bone of the occiput, contemporaneously typically accomplished with a plate and screws, is known to be strong and durable, but there are many competing methods used to secure an adequate number of fixation points of sufficient strength at the cervical end. Extension of hardware to the midcervical region to acquire additional fixation points, however, results in loss of subaxial motion segments and additional potential morbidity. The C2 vertebra is unique in that its morphology and dimensions permit fixation with longer screws than are typically possible to place in the midcervical lateral masses. Translaminar and pars screw techniques, both commonly used to achieve C2 fixation, are not mutually exclusive, as their respective trajectories are considerably different and engage different portions of the bony anatomy. METHODS: We describe a novel, 4-point C2 fixation technique for OC fusion that may avoid the need to extend fusion to the subaxial spine. RESULTS: This technical note illustrates how 4-point C2 fixation can be employed in occiptocervical fusion. CONCLUSIONS: 4-point fixation of C2 combining translaminar and pars screw placement is technically feasible and may be a suitable strategy to spare subaxial motion segments in OC fusion procedures. Futher investigation may establish its applicability to additional surgical procedures.

Rate and Characteristics of Vertebral Artery Injury Following C1-C2 Posterior Cervical Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative vascular injuries in the cervical spine are rare, but carry significant morbidity and mortality when they do occur. There is a need to better characterize the risk of vertebral artery injury (VAI) after posterior C1-C2 fusion. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of VAI in patients undergoing posterior C1-C2 cervical fusion. METHODS: An electronic database search was performed to identify studies that reported rates of VAI following posterior cervical fusion at C1-C2 level. Patient-specific risk factors, surgical indication, surgical technique, and other data were collected for each study. Forest plots were created to outline the pooled ratios of VAI in the literature. RESULTS: Eleven studies with 773 patients were identified. Mean age of patients was 48.47 years (range, 6-78 years), and most patients were female (61.7%, n = 399). Trauma was the most frequent indication for surgery (18.8%, n = 146), followed by inflammatory processes affecting the vertebrae (13.2%, n = 102). The rate of VAI per patient was 2% (95% confidence interval = 1%-4%) among 773 patients, while injury rate per screw was 1% (95% confidence interval = 0%-2%) among 2238 screws placed. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of VAI after C1-C2 posterior cervical fusion was found to be 2% for each operated patient and 1% for each screw placed.

Coexisting Retrocerebellar Arachnoid Cyst and Chiari Type 1 Malformation: 3 Pediatric Cases of Surgical Management Tailored to the Pathogenic Mechanism and Systematic Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Arachnoid cysts are benign cerebrospinal fluid collection within a duplication of arachnoid membrane and, when found in the retrocerebellar site, they may be associated with tonsils herniation. This rare situation of coexisting retrocerebellar arachnoid cyst (AC) and Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-1) have been previously reported in few cases (10 patients) with syringomyelia and hydrocephalus described to be the most relevant issues. The aim of this paper is to describe 3 pediatric cases of this condition with a systematic review of the literature, underlining the importance of surgical management tailored to the pathogenic mechanism. METHODS: A restrospective analysis of patients treated for coexisting CM-1 and ACs at the authors' institution has been carried out. RESULTS: A case of a 10-month-old baby with coexisting AC and CM-1 with tri-ventricular hydrocephalus treated with endoscopic third ventriculostomy, a case of a 1-year-old child with a huge retrocerebellar AC and CM-1 treated with a cysto-peritoneal shunt, and a case of a 15-year-old child with retrocerebellar AC causing symptomatic CM-1 treated with C0-C2 decompression, AC fenestration and duraplasty are described. A long-term follow-up is reported. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of coexisting ACs and CM-1 should not aim at the complete resolution of the cyst or of tonsil herniation, especially when pediatric patients are treated. Rather, the purpose of the neurosurgeon should be to understand the underlying pathogenic mechanism, and then restoring both the cerebrospinal fluid flow in the posterior fossa and the dynamic equilibrium between ventricles, cyst, and subarachnoid space.

Results of Conservative and Surgical Management in Children with Idiopathic and Nonidiopathic Os Odontoideum.

OBJECTIVE: The outcomes of conservative and operative treatment of os odontoideum in children remain unclear. Our objective was to study the outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment of idiopathic os odontoideum in children and compare these outcomes in age- and treatment-matched nonidiopathic children with os odontoideum. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter review identified 102 children with os odontoideum, of whom 44 were idiopathic with minimum 2-year follow-up. Ten patients were treated conservatively, and 34 underwent spinal arthrodesis. Both groups were matched with nonidiopathic patients by age and type of treatment. Cervical arthrodesis was recommended for patients with increased atlantoaxial distance or reduced space available for the cord in flexion-extension radiographs. RESULTS: All 20 children undergoing conservative treatment remained asymptomatic during follow-up, but 1 nonidiopathic patient developed cervical instability. The idiopathic group had significantly less severe radiographic cervical instability and less neurologic complications than the nonidiopathic group (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Thirty-three (97%) patients in the idiopathic group and 32 (94%) patients in the nonidiopathic group (94%) had spinal fusion at final follow-up (P = 0.55). The risk of complications (15% vs. 41%; odds ratio 0.234, 95% confidence interval 0.072-0.757, P = 0.015) and nonunion (6% vs. 24%; odds ratio 0.203, 95% confidence interval 0.040-0.99, P = 0.040) were significantly lower in the idiopathic than in the nonidiopathic group. Idiopathic children undergoing rigid fixation achieved spinal fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Idiopathic patients with stable atlantoaxial joint at presentation remained asymptomatic and intact during conservative treatment. Idiopathic children with os odontoideum undergoing spinal arthrodesis had significantly fewer complications and nonunion than nonidiopathic children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Chondrosarcoma in the body of the C2 vertebral axis.

Chondrosarcoma, a malignant bone tumor, is rarely encountered in the cervical spine. This article describes a patient whose neck pain and dysphagia were caused by an expansive, destructive lesion with calcification that was located in the body of the axis (C2 vertebra), the first time a chondrosarcoma has been reported in this location.

Comparison of Two Bone Grafting Techniques Applied During Posterior C1-C2 Screw-Rod Fixation and Fusion for Treating Reducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Several bone grafting techniques for posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis have been reported. The techniques of placing a cancellous morselized bone graft (MBG) on decorticated surfaces of the atlantoaxial complex and securing a structural iliac bone graft (SBG) between C1 and C2 have been used widely. The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of these 2 bone grafting techniques for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. METHODS: The data from 64 patients with reducible atlantoaxial dislocation treated using posterior C1-C2 screw-rod fixation and fusion were retrospectively reviewed. The MBG technique had been used in 32 patients and the SBG technique in 32 patients. The time required for bone fusion was recorded. The outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale score, Neck Disability Index, visual analog scale (VAS) score for neck pain, patient satisfaction, and neck stiffness and compared between the 2 groups. The donor site complications were also compared, and donor site pain was assessed using a VAS. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the bone fusion rate was 100% in both groups. No significant differences were found in the bone fusion time or donor site pain between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Postoperatively, The Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale scores, Neck Disability Index, and VAS score for neck pain had improved significantly within both groups (P < 0.05), with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, no differences were found between the 2 groups in patient satisfaction and neck stiffness postoperatively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The MBG and SBG techniques were both effective for atlantoaxial arthrodesis, with the advantages of reducing the potential risk of catastrophic bleeding of the epidural venous plexus and C2 nerve root injury.

Minimally invasive posterior percutaneous transarticular C1-C2 screws: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: Transarticular C1-C2 screw fixation, first described by Magerl, is a widely accepted used technique for C1-C2 instability with a good biomechanical stability and fusion rate. METHOD: We present a 69-year-old woman, who was diagnosed with a C2 Odontoid fracture type III and primarily treated with conservative treatment and collar. During first 2 weeks of follow-up, the patient developed cervical pain associated with C1-C2 instability. A minimally invasive posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw instrumentation with a percutaneus approach was performed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive approach with tubular transmuscular approach for C1-C2 transarticular screws instrumentation is safe and effective for C1-C2 instability.